Illinois PRC's Win Reprieve from Forced Abortion Advocacy
An Illinois circuit judge has blocked enforcement of a new state law which would have required pregnancy resource centers to refer women to abortion clinics.
Circuit Judge Eugene Doherty has issued a preliminary injunction against the law, which was approved by the Illinois Legislature earlier this year and signed into law by Governor Bruce Rauner.
The new statute requires physicians, medical professionals, and agencies serving pregnant women to tell them that abortion is a "treatment option" for pregnancy, and explain the "benefits" of obtaining an abortion.
The bill also would require pregnancy resource centers to provide women with a list of providers that "they reasonably believe may offer" abortions.
The new law affects 51 different crisis pregnancy centers providing pro-life support services to women in communities across Illinois.
Judge Doherty, a circuit judge in Winnebago County, has scheduled a hearing for January 10th on the lawsuit filed by the Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford and two other PRC's.
"Forcing pro-life doctors and pregnancy resource centers to operate as referral agents for the abortion industry in violation of their freedom of conscience is unconstitutional and unethical," says Matt Bowman, Senior Counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom.
"No state has the authority to compel health professionals against their will to break their sacred oath to 'do no harm' in the practice of medicine," Bowman added.
"Our fight for our conscience rights, the lives of the unborn, and the best interests of women will press on," says Susan Barrett, executive director of Aid for Women, a PRC in Chicago which is also a plaintiff in the lawsuit.
"We have an absolute moral and Constitutional right to save lives, and that is precisely what we intend to continue doing," Barrett observed.
Legal battles in other states with similar laws to that in Illinois have had mixed results. In October, a federal district court struck down a Baltimore ordinance that mandated that pregnancy resource centers make referrals to abortion providers.
However, in the same month the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a law adopted by the California Legislature in 2015 that required PRC's to promote abortion as a "treatment" for pregnancy.
At the time, Matt Bowman of ADF had this to say:
"It's bad enough if the government tells you what you can't say, but a law that tells you what you must say is even more unjust and dangerous."
"In this case, political allies of abortionists are seeking to punish pro-life pregnancy centers by forcing them to promote abortion in violation of their First Amendment freedoms," Bowman concluded.
James Dobson, the founder of Focus on the Family, had some bold advice for directors and employees of crisis pregnancy centers following the 9th Circuit decision.
"If California attempts to enforce this law, do not comply. Make them put you in jail. We must continue to fight to promote a culture of life, adoption, and health." .
Listen to the Broadcast Version of the Jeff City Update online at
MO Family Champion
for the Year 2016:
Senator Bob Onder
One of the central legal principles involving our First Amendment right to freedom of speech is that we not only have the right to speak our mind with regard to our thoughts and opinions, but that we also have the right not to speak. The government cannot compel us to speak words and voice sentiments that contradict our personal beliefs and convictions.
One of the central legal principles involving our First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion is that we not only have the right to engage in conduct and activities that reflect our religious beliefs, but we also have the right not to engage in behavior and actions which violate our religious convictions. The government cannot force us to participate in conduct that violates our individual rights of conscience.
Never before have these legal principles been put more to the test in our nation than in the environment following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. In that decision, issued in the summer of last year, a slim majority of the High Court ruled that states must redefine the sacred institution of marriage to include immoral same-sex unions.
In the wake of that decision, devout Christians who believe in the sanctity of true marriage have been the targets and victims of punitive government actions and private lawsuits. They have been charged with "discrimination" based on so-called "sexual orientation" because they have declined to participate in supporting or condoning the perversion of marriage.
The vicious attacks on the human rights and civil liberties of Bible-believing Christians have been aimed at individuals and organizations in both the religious and secular sphere. Pastors, churches, religious schools, and non-profit religious organizations have come under legal fire for their commitment to traditional marriage.
Private businesses such as bakers, florists, photographers, and other wedding vendors have faced excessive fines and penalties for declining to participate in same-sex union ceremonies and celebrations. In the worst incident, a Christian couple in Oregon were fined $135,000 for refusing to decorate a wedding cake celebrating a relationship God has declared to be an abomination.
Most politicians have responded to these attacks on the conscience rights of the Christian community by fleeing as far from the issue as they can. They are intimidated by and fearful of the hateful rhetoric and ugly tactics of "gay rights" activists and their collaborators in the corporate and media world.
In Missouri, there has been one most notable exception--State Senator Bob Onder of Lake St. Louis. Senator Onder introduced a proposed constitutional amendment this past session that would have enhanced religious liberty protections in Missouri's Constitution. It was known as Senate Joint Resolution 39.
The constitutional amendment would have protected ministers and religious institutions from government penalties and private damages because of their belief that marriage is the union of one man and one woman. It would have provided similar protection to businesses in the private sector who provide services to weddings who are believers in the sanctity of marriage.
Senator Onder was successful in gaining approval of his proposal by the Missouri Senate. However, Senate Joint Resolution 39 died in the House when legislators yielded
to pressure from bullies in the corporate community, the "gay rights" lobby, and their media agents. As a result, Missourians were denied the opportunity to vote on a measure which would have strengthened religious freedom in our state.
Because of his courage in leading the effort for this religious liberty measure, the Missouri Family Policy Council is honoring Senator Bob Onder as our
Missouri Family Champion for the year 2016. Throughout the debate and controversy surrounding this proposal, Senator Onder demonstrated that he is a man of both extraordinary integrity and selfless Christian conviction.
Senator Onder is one of those rare members of the General Assembly who is both a doctor and a lawyer. His medical practice specializes in allergy and immunology. He is a graduate of the Washington University School of Medicine and the St. Louis
University School of Law.
Bob Onder's public service career began in 2007 after he was elected as a member of the Missouri House from St. Charles County. After serving one term in the Legislature, he made an unsuccessful run for the U.S. Congress. He returned to public service in 2015 upon being elected to the State Senate from the 2nd Senatorial District, representing the western portion of St. Charles County. He currently serves as the Assistant Majority Floor Leader in the U.S. Senate.
Senator Onder has been a longtime leader in the pro-life movement. He has previously served on the Board of Directors of Missouri Right to Life, and was heavily
involved in the statewide effort to combat Amendment 2, which legalized human cloning in the State of Missouri.
Bob Onder lives in Lake St. Louis with his wife Allison and their six children. Allison has been the primary home educator to their four sons and two daughters. They are members of St. Gianna Catholic Church.
We thank you, Senator Onder, for your valiant efforts to defend the religious liberties of clergy, churches, and citizens in Missouri who believe in God's design for marriage and the family. We commend you for withstanding the mean-spirited attacks on your
character this past year with dignity and grace.
We look forward to many more years of your conscientious and virtuous leadership in public life. You have distinguished yourself as a genuine champion of Missouri families.