Banner 2 no message

Missouri Family E-News

July 15, 2014

                                               
Nixon Vetoes Tax Credit
Bill for
PRC Donors   

 

Missouri Governor Jay Nixon has vetoed legislation which would have expanded the state program providing tax credits for donations to pregnancy resource centers and maternity homes.

 

Under current law, donors to PRC's and maternity homes can receive a tax credit equivalent to 50 percent of their total contribution.  The maximum tax credit that can be claimed in any single year cannot exceed $50,000.  

 

The tax benefit is significant since it it is a tax credit and not a tax deduction, and thus is a dollar-for-dollar reduction of tax liability.

 

The legislation vetoed by Nixon, House Bill 1132, was sponsored by Representative Kevin Engler of Farmington.  It would have expanded the total amount of tax credits available for pregnancy resource center donations from $2 million to $2.5 million annually.

 

Engler's bill would have also increased the ceiling on donations to maternity homes by $500,000 to $2.5 million each year, and hiked the limit on donations to food pantries by a similar amount to $1.75 million.  

 

Nixon said in his veto message that he vetoed the bill because of his overall objection to expanding the state's tax credit programs.  However, the benevolent tax credit programs mentioned above are  but a small part of the state's tax credit programs, which are primarily devoted to supposed economic development purposes.

 

House Speaker Tim Jones deplored the Governor's action.  "Charitable contributions to organizations like food pantries and pregnancy resource centers are vital to our society, and these are exactly the kinds of programs that our tax credit system was designed to support."

 

"This bill contained only modest increases to the cap on credits, which would help encourage donations to service organizations that are struggling in this economy.  To veto this bill in the name of making a political point is absolutely reprehensible."

 

The Legislature will reconvene on September 10th to consider the Governor's veto.  A veto override is almost a certainty, since the measure was approved in the House by a vote of 121-25, and in the Senate by a vote of 30-1.

 

You can let your state legislators know how you feel about the Governor's veto by using the links in the adjacent column. 

 

    
Pro-Life Nurse Faces Job Bias
For Views
     

A Florida nurse has been denied employment by a Tampa health center because of her personal pro-life convictions.

Sara Hellwege applied for a nurse-midwife position with the Tampa Family Health Center, which is a federally-funded facility. 

After submitting her application, Hellwege was questioned by the human resources director about her membership in the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 

She acknowledged her participation in the national pro-life medical organization, and that she had religious objections to both abortion and the distribution of abortifacient drugs.

Hellwege subsequently received an email from the clinic stating that "due to the fact that...you are a member of AAPLOG, we would be unable to move forward in the interviewing process."

The Alliance Defending Freedom has filed suit in U.S District Court and with the Equal Opportunity Commission.  The legal actions cite provisions of federal law that prohibit discrimination against doctors and nurses because of their pro-life views.

"Federal and state law make it clear that being pro-abortion cannot be a requisite for employment," says Matt Bowman, senior legal counsel for ADF.

"Federally funded facilities cannot force nurses to assist with practices that could lead to an abortion," Bowman adds.  "No one deserves to suffer discrimination just because they are pro-life."


  

Listen to the Broadcast Version of the Jeff City Update online at 
null  


Legislators Work to Override Nixon Veto
    of 72-Hour Bill   
 

Legislative leaders in the Missouri General Assembly are lining up the votes to override Governor Jay Nixon's veto of major new pro-life legislation.  Nixon vetoed a bill which would extend the waiting period for an abortion from 24 to 72 hours.

The legislation was adopted by veto-proof majorities in both the Missouri House and Senate.  The bill is designed to ensure that women considering abortion have sufficient time to evaluate their options after being provided information about the abortion procedure.

Governor Nixon says he voted the bill because it is "insulting to women" and "serves no demonstrable purpose other than to create emotional and financial hardships for women."  A centerpiece of Nixon's veto message was the false claim made by the abortion industry that the bill would victimize women who have been sexually assaulted.

Senator David Sater of Cassville, who initiated the legislation, expressed deep disappointment with the Governor's decision.  "Abortion is a matter of life and death.  This is an irreversible and permanent decision, and taking the time to think about the consequences is not unreasonable or a burden...I firmly believe that most Missourians do not think that three days is too much time to decide whether to bring a child into this world."

Senator Sater took aim at Nixon's objection to the lack of a rape exception in the bill.  "Under current law, victims of rape can immediately receive medical treatment at a hospital emergency room and cannot be turned away.  After a physical examination, the patient is given options of treatment of care, including preventative contraception.  [This bill] in no way changes the existing law allowing rape victims to seek immediate medical treatment or contraception."

Senator Sater also charged that Nixon's veto was politically motivated.  "Governor Nixon decides to be pro-life or pro-choice depending on the next election.  Serious elected officials remember that unborn children are not abstractions to play politics with.  They are real people...and deserve protection under the law."

The final version of the bill vetoed by the Governor came out of the Missouri House, and was sponsored by Representatives Kevin Elmer of Nixa and Keith Frederick of Rolla.  House Speaker Tim Jones issued a statement condemning Nixon's anti-life actions.

"The most important thing our Legislature can do is protect life, and I know I am not alone in this belief.  This is a common sense measure, and it unconscionable for Governor Nixon to veto this bill.  Life must be protected, and I will not waver in my commitment to make Missouri one of the safest states in the nation for the unborn."

Extending the abortion reflection period is a crucial element in assuring that women are able to make an informed choice concerning an unintended pregnancy.  The first major step in promoting an informed decision occurred four years ago, when the Legislature adopted a comprehensive informed consent statute.

Under that law, a woman who visits an abortion clinic receives a packet of information which includes detailed information concerning the nature and risks of the abortion procedure, and alternatives to abortion.  She is provided materials which depict the development of the preborn child at various stages, and is offered the opportunity to view an ultrasound of her child and hear the heartbeat of the child if it is audible.

The woman is also provided the names and contact information of pregnancy resource centers and adoption agencies which would assist her in carrying her child to term.  She is also made aware of state and federal programs which may provide financial assistance to cover the cost of prenatal and newborn care.

We believe that is vital that a woman have adequate time to evaluate all this information and make her own decision in an objective, dispassionate, and deliberate manner.  Extended reflection periods also diminish the intense pressure women often receive to abort their children from boyfriends, husbands, parents, and even sexual predators.

The Missouri General Assembly will meet in veto session on September 10th, and it seems likely that both chambers will succeed at overriding the Governor's veto.  The bill, Senate Committee Substitute for House Bills 1307 and 1313, was approved in the House by a vote of 111-39.  109 votes are needed for an override.  Six members of the House who were absent are also likely votes for an override.  The total vote count includes ten pro-life Democrats who would seem committed to face down the Governor on this issue.

The only real drama will occur in the Senate, where the bill was adopted on a vote of 22-9.  23 votes are needed for an override.  However, one pro-life Senator was absent for that vote.  If all 23 of those Senators are present, the bill will be enacted into law over the Governor's objections.  Yet, if even one of those Senators is absent when the vote occurs, the override motion would fail.

Should the override succeed, Missouri would become the third state with a 72-hour waiting period, along with Utah and South Dakota.  While a lawsuit challenging the statute might occur, we are confident that the 8th U.S Circuit Court of Appeals, and if necessary, the U.S. Supreme Court, will uphold the law.

We encourage you to contact your state senator and state representative to urge them to vote to override the Governor's veto. 

You can contact your state senator by using this link:
Your State Senator

You can contact your state representative by clicking this link:
Your State Representative

If you do not know who your legislators are, you can find that information with this link:
Legislator Lookup

Joe's Signature